Lindbergh is intended to be a major connection point for future Atlanta BeltLine transit, which is also in a study phase, and the Clifton Corridor project is likely to be built first. ART is essentially an express bus with traffic signal priority.Īll of the routes are now drawn with gray boxes on the map indicating uncertainty of how exactly they would connect with the terminus stations, an issue MARTA continues to study. One BRT option includes “arterial rapid transit” (ART) bus service along Clairmont Road connecting the line to the Decatur station. The light rail transit (LRT) alternative no longer includes subway options. “Either mode provides the transit access we have needed for so long to provide our staff, students, patients and visitors the ability to directly connect into the MARTA system.”Īll three proposed routes predominantly use a similar path along the railroad, roughly paralleling Clifton Road and the corridor of North Decatur Road and DeKalb Industrial Way. “Emory strongly supports the alternative to the Avondale MARTA Station and is open to either light rail or bus rapid transit,” said Willis. Betty Willis, Emory’s senior associate vice president of government and community affairs, said in a written statement that the university is staying open-minded. Large institutions along the proposed routes, such as Emory University, have already seen the alternatives as well. The transit agency provided SaportaReport with a private preview of the presentation before the public meetings. The alternatives are scheduled to be unveiled to the general public in community meetings on Nov. They all use a similar route along the CSX railroad right-of-way and local streets. All three options continue to have Buckhead’s Lindbergh Center Station as the western terminus, connecting the route to the Gold and Red heavy-rail lines. One of the bus rapid transit (BRT) options also includes a spur bus route to Decatur Station. MARTA’s alternatives for the Clifton Corridor transit line are down to three options – two bus routes and one light-rail line – all with Avondale Station as the main eastern terminus. Wyeth officials may adopt the Emory method.MARTA narrows Clifton Corridor alternatives to two bus options, one light rail line - SaportaReport Close The Wyeth method suggests cutting the adhesion around each rod, 1 at a time. In the Emory method, vigorous movement with a small, curved hemostat, opened and closed in a different directions, is used to open the adhesions around all the implant rods at the same time. 3-4 mm), and vigorous disruption of adhesions. The major differences between the 2 techniques are that the Emory method requires more anesthesia (6-8 cc vs. The Wyeth method takes 5 minutes and 10 seconds and the Emory method takes only 2 minutes and 45 seconds. The video presents a best case scenario (a family planning provider with surgical experience) to compare the 2 techniques. Hatcher says that some clinicians have considerable difficulty with the Wyeth method, even clinician with considerable surgical experience, so the Emory method is a good alternative. Hatcher, director of the Emory University/Grady Memorial Hospital Family Planning Clinic, demonstrate the procedure in a training video called The Emory Method for Rapid Norplant Removal. The Emory technique's originator and her colleague, R.A. Many clinicians find it simpler than the method developed by the US distributor of Norplant, Wyeth Ayerst Laboratories of Philadelphia. It reduces the removal time to under 10 minutes for all clinicians, irrespective of surgical experience. Seshu Sarma, a family planning physician at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia, developed a new procedure to remove Norplant implants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |